 |
| Police closing in on Brian Thompson shooter |
First up would be the shooter, whom authorities believe they have found. You might think that is sufficient to explain the taking of a person's life but you would be wrong. Remember, this person had positioned him or herself in wait for Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, for the purpose of killing him. It would appear that the shooter didn't know Thompson, thus, there was some other objective in what he did. The people have spoken in social media with an opinion that Thompson deserved what he got.
Vox says it all in its headline, "The deep roots of Americans’ hatred of their health care system." The article by Dylan Scott reports there is significant evidence of the fact that the way the country provides medical services is costly in both money and human life. Not only the lives of patients but now a life of the CEO of the largest health insurer in the U.S., UnitedHealthcare. The public is more than justified in its anger when a company who could save your life uses AI for a reason to let you die. Vox goes on...
"On the same day as the shooting, news that a different insurer would restrict coverage for anesthesia during surgeries went viral, serving as a kind of cosmic confirmation of this line of thinking."
This was withdrawn almost immediately with the murder of Brian Thompson. It was a stupid decision to arbitrarily restrict anesthesia time in surgeries, to save money, of course, with no consideration whatsoever for the needs of the anesthesiologist, who, in fact, has the responsibility for the patient. Here's another blunt comment from Vox...
"Put every aspect of this tragic episode together and you have the rotten core of American health care. The cruelties of the US medical system and the ongoing blame game between the private industries that profit from it have left patients angry and confused — and looking for someone, anyone, to blame, fairly or not."
 |
| Luigi Mangione, suspected Brian Thompson murderer |
Scott thinks the only way to solve the problem is to confront all the industry offenders who are responsible for this aggregate of failures. The author also harks back to the days when medicine was much simpler. The participants were allies, not fighting each other constantly for profits. He also explains, "prices have continued to spiral upward, accelerated by the aging of the baby boomers and by important but costly advancements in medical science." Conversely, guess we couldn't do without any of this.Obamacare was a strike against the private insurance industry, but since its enactment, Republicans have tried non-stop to kill the program. With only a mention now, but worth considerable coverage in the future, big pharma was caught off-guard by Biden's recent Inflation Reduction Act. We'll see the full effect in 2025....
"a provision allowing for Medicare to negotiate prices with drugmakers, which would lower costs and allow the program to cap seniors’ out-of-pocket costs."
And I have never seen a blame game carried out with the intensity of that in the medical insurance industry. Here are the sordid facts...
- Hospitals blame drug companies (for charging high prices that they must pass on to payers) and insurers (for restricting benefits and leaving patients exposed to uncovered bills)
- Drug companies blame insurers (for charging patients high out-of-pocket costs for medications) and hospitals (for exploiting technical programs like 340B to artificially boost their profits); they also blame the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) who coordinate among drug manufacturers, plans, and pharmacies
- Insurers blame hospitals and drug companies (for charging too much money for their services and products, which patients bear through higher premiums and out-of-pocket costs)
- Patients blame everybody (for the high costs they face and the hassles of navigating this complicated system).
